Troubling Black Bear Legislation Workings its Way Through Florida House and Senate |
HB 87, Taking of Bears, by Rep. Shoaf (R-Port St. Joe), and its Senate companion, SB 632, by Sen. Simon (R- Tallahassee), create the “Self Defense Act.”
The act specifies that a person who uses lethal force to take a bear is not subject to any administrative, civil, or criminal penalties. The bills include broadly written language allowing Floridians to kill black bears if they feel threatened.
The State of Florida’s constitution establishes the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and grants FWC the regulatory and executive powers of the state concerning wild animal life, freshwater aquatic life, and marine life. This law, if passed, will be unconstitutional and could force the state to spend tax dollars defending against a valid legal challenge.
The Florida black bear historically roamed throughout the state, but now lives in several fragmented areas. As the populations of both humans and bears have expanded, there has been an increase in human-bear conflicts, particularly in residential areas, where bears often search for food. People and bears can live compatibly together with a few careful provisions, and the FWC has successful programs that subsidize the purchase of bear-proof trash cans to avoid attractive nuisances that drive negative human-bear interactions.
The House passed the bill last week and sent it to the Senate for consideration. The Senate made a change to make clear the self-defense protections wouldn’t be available to people who lure bears with food or for purposes such as for training dogs to hunt bears. The amended bill will have to be considered again by the House.
The solution to rising negative interactions between bears and people is well-funded programs educating and assisting communities with bear-proofing. If the FWC were to entertain creating a rule to address personal protection, it would need to be much more narrowly defined than this expansive and unconstitutional legislation, to ensure the provision is not abused. |
|
|
|
|